Citizen Science

@article{schmidtke_sustainable_2024,

title = {Sustainable Implementation of Citizen-Based Plastic Monitoring of Fresh Waters in Western Africa},

author = {Lea Schmidtke and Tim H. M. Van Emmerik and Rose Boahemaa Pinto and Louise J. Schreyers and Christian Schmidt and Katrin Wendt-Potthoff and Sabrina Kirschke},

url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/10007},

doi = {10.3390/su162210007},

issn = {2071-1050},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-11-01},

urldate = {2025-04-04},

journal = {Sustainability},

volume = {16},

number = {22},

pages = {10007},

abstract = {Citizen science projects globally have increasingly been implemented in collecting and analysing environmental data. At the same time, these initiatives are often project-based and, therefore, of short duration. This presents a challenge as data from such activities may not be used in research and political decision-making. This research aims to explore the barriers and solutions for establishing a sustainable long-term citizen-based plastic monitoring strategy in fresh waters based on a case study in Accra, Ghana. This case study is particularly relevant due to the significant issue of plastic pollution in the region, limited official monitoring data to effectively address the problem, and the potential role of citizen science in addressing this data gap in the long term. Data on barriers and solutions were collected based on eight expert interviews, a survey amongst 17 stakeholders, and subsequent roundtable discussions with 24 experts and stakeholders from academia, the private sector, the public sector, and civil society. From this, we identified 30 types of barriers and 21 types of solutions to implement citizen science in the long term. These barriers and solutions relate to five fields of action (social, economic, environmental, technical, and management and governance) and four stakeholder groups (public sector, private sector, civil society, and academia) to implement solution pathways for long-term citizen science projects. Based on our findings, we make suggestions as to how citizen science can be implemented more sustainably in the future in different fields of action and from various institutional perspectives. With this, we hope to advance the potential use of citizen science and citizen science data in research and policy design related to plastics in fresh waters.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{earthwatch_institute_policy_2024,

title = {Policy Brief - The role of citizen science in improving ambient water quality},

author = {Earthwatch Institute},

url = {https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.12650972},

doi = {10.5281/ZENODO.12650972},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-07-01},

urldate = {2025-05-28},

abstract = {Recommended Citation: WWQA, 2024. Policy Brief – The role of citizen science in improving ambient water quality - Sustainable Development Target 6.3. Published by Earthwatch Europe on behalf of the United Nations Environment Programme-coordinated World Water Quality Alliance. July 2024. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12650972 

This is the Policy Brief. There is an accompanying Technical Brief. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12634359 

Key messageInternational recognition of the need for global action on water is building. In 2023 the UN Water Conferencemade it clear that water is essential for the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals, and for the health and prosperity of people and planet. But that progress on water related goals and targets remains alarmingly off track. The 2024 United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA 6) resolution on Effective and inclusive solutions for strengthening water policies - (UNEP/EA.6/L.13) makes clear that the collection of water quality data needs to be enhanced and used for evidence-based decision making and informed water resource management. Despite the awareness that good ambient water quality is crucial for human survival, it is alarming how little information about the quality of water in lakes, rivers, and groundwater is available globally. Urgent action needs to be taken if we want to understand and protect our water supplies. This brief calls for international policy makers and local communities to work together to monitor and improve water quality using a readily available approach – citizen science. Without immediate adoption, the authors believe that Sustainable Development Target 6.3 will not be met.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{warner_empowering_2024,

title = {Empowering citizen scientists to improve water quality: from monitoring to action},

author = {Stuart Warner and Sara Blanco Ramírez and Sandra De Vries and Nancy Marangu and Henriette Ateba Bessa and Carla Toranzo and Madina Imaralieva and Tommaso Abrate and Enock Kiminta and José Castro and Marcelo Luiz De Souza and Abdul Ghaffar Memon and Steven Loiselle and Mohamed Sahr E. Juanah},

url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frwa.2024.1367198/full},

doi = {10.3389/frwa.2024.1367198},

issn = {2624-9375},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-04-01},

urldate = {2025-04-04},

journal = {Frontiers in Water},

volume = {6},

pages = {1367198},

abstract = {Citizen science (CS) has so far failed to achieve its potential to contribute to water resource management globally despite a significant body of work proclaiming the benefits of such an approach. Also, this work has addressed concerns over precision, accuracy and reliability of methods used. This article presents the findings of a hackathon-type workshop challenge that brought together water quality experts and CS practitioners to explore barriers and possible solutions to mainstream citizen scientist-generated data into national, regional, and global reporting processes, and thereby provide a tangible connection between policy makers and community-based citizen scientists. We present the findings here as a perspective-type summary. This workshop challenge highlighted the breadth and scope of CS activities globally yet recognized that their potential for positive impact is going unrealized. The challenge team proposed that impact could be improved by: developing awareness; applying a simultaneous bottom-up/top-down approach to increase success rates; that local leaders or ‘catalysts' are key to initiate and sustain activities; that generated data need to fulfill a purpose and create required information, and ultimately, lead to actions (data > information > action); recognizing that we are all potential citizen scientists is important; recognizing that “good water quality” is subjective; and lastly that developing a communication gateway that allows bi-directional data and information transfer is essential.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}